|
Selecting Good Stock Photography in
the Age of Digital
by: Beth Brodovsky
The business of stock photography has drastically
changed over the last few years. Ten years ago, selecting photographs
for your brochure or newsletter meant spending hours pouring over stock
photography catalogs and ordering photo research to find the exact
image. When the order came in a giant overnight package, designers
would spread transparencies out on the light table, squinting through a
magnifying loop to check every detail.
Enter the digital age.
High speed Internet connections. CD’s. Searchable
Archives. Royalty-free stock. These elements have changed the face of
communication design forever. The quality, quantity, affordability and
accessibility of stock imagery have made it the resource of choice for
many organizations.
The advantages of instantaneous access to searchable
archives of good images are numerous.
- Speed :: We can never have enough of it. Search.
Download. Import. It’s remarkable.
- Choice :: Searching "stock photography" on Google
delivers 1,470,000 results. You can find pretty much anything out
there.
- Price :: While there are free resources, unless you
are doing a school report, you may need something slightly more
exclusive. Also, many of the free images are only good enough for
online display and the selection is very limited. Royalty-free images
are reasonably priced, you pay for only the size you’ll use and images
can be used as needed with no extra charges.
- Flexibility :: Image selections can be grouped, saved
and emailed to others in the review cycle. People in different
locations can simultaneously review ideas.
- Archiving :: Some companies even keep a record of
your buys that you can re-download whenever you need them. To use this
resource effectively, there are a few things you need to keep in mind.
- Plan ahead :: Will you ever need the picture to be
printed? The low cost of "low resolution" images can lure you into
costly mistakes. Images need to be 300 dpi (dots per inch) at the size
they will be printed.
- Low-cost tradeoff :: Pictures are now so affordable,
everyone’s buying them. That means your image could show up in your
competitor’s brochure. Some projects call for more exclusive imagery.
- Image-enhancement :: When you need something totally
unique, such as your product in the shot, it may be more economical to
hire a photographer than to have your designer spend countless hours in
Photoshop trying to get it just right.
- Availability :: Good images still cost money. While
many firms have images on file, don’t expect your designer to have a
database full of images right for your project.
When searching on the web, search for "stock
photography" rather than doing an image search in Google or another
search engine. Google returns all images from the web -- including
those that are the property of others and not legally usable.
|
About The Author
Beth Brodovsky is the president and principal of
Iris Creative Group, LLC. Brodovsky earned a Bachelor of Fine Arts in
Communication Design from Pratt Institute, New York. Before launching
her own firm in 1996, she spent eight years as a corporate Art Director
and Graphic Designer, providing a sound foundation in management and
organizational standards and structure. Iris Creative specializes in
providing marketing and strategic communication services to clients in
service industries and small businesses. For more information contact
Beth at bsb@iriscreative.com
or 610-567-2799.
|
Here is today's feature Photography article.
The Top 3 Best Photo Editing Softwares
by: Maui Reyes
Being a photo editor is not rocket science. All it takes is a lot of creativity and a mastery of some of the best photo editing software available in the market.
Photoshop Elements 3
This is almost like a primer for Adobe Photoshop-so beginners, don’t feel intimidated. Elements does have some of the features that Photoshop is well known for, which comes quite handy when you’ve decided you’ve like to try your hand on something more upscale than cropping and resizing.
Click here to read the whole article.
|